Re: Question about case law

[ typographical correction: ]

    . . . divided panel of the U.S. court of appeals for
   the Third Circuit purported to deal with what they
   claimed were "facts" that were/weren't essential, 
   including some real-world facts that were essential
   but which they pretended were not in the Mumia
   Abu-Jamal case (re. which a motion for consideration
   en banc is being made).