The Constitution is a scam perpetrated by members of the Law Society for luxurious life style

July 17 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
                                                                Motion
for Sanity

                                       God can not be wise if we were
born in his image

                                                          Constitution
Act, 1982
                      Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy
of God and the rule of law

                                                        Charter
Democracy Force
 
www.cdf.name

 The Law Society of Upper Canada has been identified as a major player
in the Government Organized Crime who has conspired against the
populous of the Canadian Society to support their avarice lust for
wealth and power.
                                                   Motive,
Opportunity, Admittance

http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part1LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc
http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part2LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc

The above links to the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document
irrefutably proves the Law Society does not require its members to
give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and
evidence is irrelevant to them because the entire legal system is
illegitimate with every position of authority filled by their members
with all bases covered and the system rigged for their members to
ransack society with horrific ramifications.

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada
Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
 (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and
a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the
letter.

The Constitution: Document itself has been corrupted from the very
first line of the Charter
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy
of God and the rule of law

 
The Spirit
 
Supremacy of God

 
Golden Rule
                                      “Do unto others as you would
have them do unto you”

 
The rule of law
                                        “Roles and Responsibility of
the Attorney General”
                        
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/ag/agrole.asp
That most elusive concept – the rule of law- a well established legal
principle, hard to easily define that protects the individual and
society as a whole.

Obvious conflict between The Spirit and The rule of law is built into
the Constitution but “The Spirit” has supremacy, priority one.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights
and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits
prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person
and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the
principles of fundamental justice.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the
right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without
discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and
any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution
is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect
                       Consistencies and
Inconsistencies
The Constitution must be interpreted in “The Spirit” to maintain
consistency
From their own documents we can see they cannot be trusted because
they cannot help themselves as they are traditionally deceitful
prevaricators not interested in effective efficient justice but
instead long drawn out litigations for money thereby depriving the
taxpayer and the people of their guaranteed Charter rights of equal
protection and equal benefit of the law.

It is impossible to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
without putting a diligent modus operandi in place with competent
responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to
do so.

The rule of law is incompetent to support the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights being inconsistent with “The Spirit” of the law.

The Attorney General has a constitutional and traditional
responsibility
The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian
of the public interest"
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special
responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept - the
rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle,
but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects
individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to
ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are
legally and constitutionally valid.
So we can see from the onset the unscrupulous conniving nature of the
members of the legal profession, the law makers, the people who wrote
the Constitution and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General” that was obviously written prior to the enactment of the
Constitution with the incompetence of the rule of law obviously known
by the authors of the Constitution who have never made any attempt to
make it “effective and efficient” for obvious reason to consistently
deceive and deprive the people.

There can be no doubt they never intended to support the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights but they out connived themselves by
recognizing the supremacy of God “The Spirit” having priority over the
intended incompetence of the rule of law which they had been using to
carry on in their unscrupulous ways

Tis a web of deceit they weaved when first they practiced to deceive.

It certainly is consistent with the book by University of British
Columbia history professor Jonathan Swainger who makes reference to a
book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any form of
government is dependent on their adeptness to deceive the people and
in a democracy it is necessary to have the people believe they have a
voice and their representatives are the people.

                                                 Click on for Jonathan
Swainger Book
http://books.google.com/books?id=eRHTr2TCBMwC&pg=PA19&dq=roles+and+responsibilities+of+the+attorney+general+canada&sig=hi6yCnnxTgLu6Qjx9yJS2U80xG4#PPA19,M1

 
Plan A
                                                             Success
for the people

                     Responsibilities of the Attorney General in “The
Spirit” of the law
                                                    “Guardian of the
public interest”

From the fixed Smorgasbord of deceit and prevarication after removing
the inconsistencies in “The Spirit” of the law we have:

The Attorney General is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional
responsibility, and is the “guardian of the public interest”
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to
ensure Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.
 
Plan
B
                                                   Success for
Government conspiracy
Responsibilities of the Attorney General in the spirit of the
traditional unscrupulous ways of the members of the Law Societies
“Guardian of the rule of law”
The Attorney General has a traditional responsibility “judicial-like”
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special
responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept - the
rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle,
but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects
individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to
ensure the rule of law is maintained
The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be
laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General's agents may
provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or
not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the
decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what
manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.
We can see nothing but conflict for the Attorney General to sort out
as he goes about advising the government departments and agencies that
is impossible to maintain consistency with the Constitution right from
the outset with “The Spirit” of the law defined supreme and priority
one, clearly stated recognizing the supremacy of God, but has a
special responsibility as “guardian of the rule of law” that is
incompetent to do so.
Since he is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional
responsibility and “guardian of the public interest” he is required to
advise Cabinet and ensure their actions are legally and
constitutionally valid.

Clearly the verbatim of the law was intended to be ambiguous so the
Attorney General can go anyway he chooses and when it came to
complaints about the administration and enforcement of the
Constitution Plan B is predetermined fixed tight against the
individual of the Lower Tier.

What is an individual going to do against Goliath, eh?
Fight for the individuals rights against the individual’s tax money
and the entire government system they believe is theirs.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name
and 10 affiliate sites is consistent with the Attorney General Plan B
and inconsistent with his legitimate responsibilities in Plan A
consistent with “The Spirit” of the law conducive to the support of
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and society as a whole.

In a legal system where the presumption of innocence is to be
maintained until found guilty in a court of law it would be considered
obstruction of justice for the Attorney General to block an
individuals pursuance of justice entitled to by the Constitution.

Obviously when it is the Attorney General who is being charged and the
police consult with him he will put his specially trained tongue in
the fine art of deception and prevarication in over time to convince
the police not to lay charges but even if he is unsuccessful he gets
the final decision to decide whether or not to proceed where I suggest
his decision is predictable.

There can be no doubt the Constitution and Legal System are seriously
in disrepute.

Motive, Opportunity and Admittance are obvious demonstrated in their
modus operandi as they dealt with my two completely different cases
involving members of the Law Society.

If their was a hint of competence, responsibility, irreproachability
one of the prominent members of the governments in the AAAAAALIST
would have been aghast if they had of read the evidence and if they
did not bother are obviously incompetent and irresponsible.

There can be no doubt as to their conspiracy intent and success to
date

I remind you an interim report is due July 20 2008 and any further
delay in filing charges against the government personnel addressed in
Lawyer Files 1-4 attentive to collecting evidence as to the
involvement of the Attorney General is incomprehensible and indicative
of the don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights of equal protection and equal benefits before and under the law
as the people are in harms way as I write.
The Attorney General is responsible to advise those people and it is
just a matter of formality to have them admit they acted under the
advisement of the Attorney General.

The length of time attending to this matter is akin to the Law Society
of Upper Canada addressing my complaint against their member taking 60
days to investigate the complaint without bothering to look at the
evidence..

Surely if they were not looking at the evidence and they knew their
regulations it would not have taken 60 days for their decision.

Surely they were scrambling for a way out for their member when there
was no legitimate one.
Surely they never figured this would get to the public.

How obvious if they had looked at the evidence, which I am sure they
did, they would have found him guilty as charged.

They were obviously flustered when they admitted their members are not
required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and evidence is irrelevant in dealing with their members.

Why would they think they could get away with such a response when
they knew I was determined to get to the truth?
Inadvertently they admitted the truth for all to see and demonstrated
it in the manner they dealt with the complaint.

I would not be surprised if the Attorney General was consulted on this
matter too and I expect you to look into it thoroughly.

I remind you the evidence is spread far and wide, if that is what the
Law Society was thinking.



Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name

PS

The Constitution is a premedicated scam.

Roy McMurchy was the Ontario Attorney General who played a major role
in the patriation of the Constitution and the Charter.
After he helped out with the scam here he went over to England and
helped them before returning to be Ontario Chief Justice to retire
about a year ago.